Choosing the Right CMS: Traditional, Headless, or Low-Code?

If you need an all-in-one solution, a traditional (DXP) CMS may be ideal. For more customization, headless CMS might be better. If you want quick, streamlined tech, low or no-code CMS is likely the best fit. This overview will help you determine the best CMS for your organization.

CMS Comparison: Traditional, Headless, and Low-Code

Digital Experience Platforms (DXPs)  – Traditional CMS

Digital Experience Platforms (DXPs), or traditional CMS, are all-in-one solutions designed to manage and optimize digital experiences. While they handle content, their focus extends to features like collaboration, visitor profiling, and AI-driven personalization. Common examples include Adobe Experience Cloud, Sitecore,  Acquia (Drupal), Optimizely, and Xperience by Kentico.

Pros:

• Broad range of digital services in one platform

• Mature technology with strong web-based features

• Unified customer experience across channels

Cons:

• Complex implementation with a steep learning curve

• Higher costs compared to other CMS options

• May include unnecessary features for small projects

In short, DXPs offer the most robust features but come with higher barriers to entry. For smaller needs, more cost effective options may be a better fit.

Headless CMS (Content Microservices)

Content Microservices, or Headless CMS, focus entirely on content – its creation, scheduling, delivery, analysis, and optimization.  Unlike traditional CMS, these platforms don’t provide the “head” (the presentation layer). Instead, they deliver content through APIs like REST and GraphQL, making it accessible to various digital channels beyond just your website. This flexibility allows Headless CMS to integrate into a broader digital “stack,” connecting seamlessly with tools you actually need. Big players in this category space include Storyblok, Contentful, Kontent.ai and Contentstack.

Pros:

• Chanel-agnostic, allowing content to be used across platforms and technologies

• Operates as a subscription-based SaaS model

• Integrates with other services to create a tailored digital stack

• Structures content for easy reuse, minimizing duplication

Cons:

• Requires effort to connect and manage multiple services

• Still developing as a market, less mature than traditional DXPs

While not as feature-rich DXPs, headless CMS excels at separating content from presentation. It lets you prioritize content first, then determine how it should appear across channels. This flexibility allows you to add services as needed, avoiding premature investments in unnecessary tools. Despite being relatively new, headless CMS is now the second most common CMS choice, used by 35% of companies.

Low-code/No-code CMS

Low-code and no-code CMS options require minimal development support, making them the least complex of the three. They’re ideal for quickly building templated websites with basic features. Popular platforms include Squarespace, GoDaddy, Wix, and Webflow.

Pros:

• Ideal for prototyping and fast launches

• Minimal technical skills needs for setup

• Cloud-based with growing AI and machine learning features

Cons:

• Blends content with presentation, limiting flexibility

• Limited accessibility and performance features

• Customization still requires some coding support

Low-code/no-code CMS is designed for individuals or teams with limited coding support who need to launch quickly. While these platforms trade functionality for convenience, they’re expanding beyond websites to include apps and other digital channels.

Choosing the right CMS matters

Every organization has unique needs, and choosing the right CMS options can significantly impact revenue, engagement, and team efficiency. At Reason One, we provide the expertise to help you find a solution that fits your goals. 

Want more insights like this? Subscribe to our newsletter and stay ahead of the latest CMS trends and insights.